Stahl Eye Center

Recently, a fossil 140 million years, called Shenzhouraptor sinensis was discovered in the Yixian region of China. According to the evolutionary paleontologist Ji Qiang, this fossil was a missing link between dinosaurs and birds. The fact is, however, that this fossil has features that conflict with the claims of evolutionists on the origin of birds. This not only fuels, but also all of paleontological data on the subject is in contradiction with the theory of evolution. "The evolution of birds", like other claims made by Darwinism, is no more scientific than a fairy tale.

Shenzhouraptor sinensis, the form can not transition

Evolutionists suggest that Shenzhouraptor sinensis was a form of transition that has been able to fly and had the characteristics of birds and dinosaurs. It is, however, contradicts the claims of other evolutionists on the origin of birds.

Archaeopteryx, the earliest known bird, lived 150 million years and is in many ways no different from flying birds that live today. Shenzhouraptor sinensis, however, lived 140 million years ago, making it younger than Archaeopteryx. For this reason, it is impossible for it to be a transitional form, because birds with feathers and perfect anatomical structure necessary for flight lived before.

Archaeopteryx: Recent studies show that it is
"Much more than previously imagined flies."
At this stage, we must be clear that the evolutionist claims regarding Archaeopteryx icons on the principle of the theory of evolution for the past 100 years, have lost much of their validity. It was found that this creature was a flying bird, which has a flawless flight mechanism. Attempts to compare it to a reptile Archaeopteryx have completely failed.

As Alan Feduccia, one of the leading ornithologists in the world, said: "Most recent workers who have studied various anatomical features of Archaeopteryx have found the creature to be much more bird than expected," and " the resemblance of Archaeopteryx to theropod dinosaurs has been grossly overestimated. "(1)

Another problem regarding Archaeopteryx is that theropod dinosaurs, which suggest many evolutionists were the ancestors of Archaeopteryx, brings out after him in the fossil record, not before. This, of course, leaves no room for any tree "evolutionary family" to take account of the origin of birds.

Quarrels evolutionary

The reason for the "dino-bird" and "feathered dinosaur" stories that appear frequently in the press is simply an evolutionary effort on their part to show that the claim that birds evolved from dinosaurs has been proven by fossil discoveries. The fact is, however, none of these fossils has provided no scientific evidence for this claim at all. Moreover, evolutionists can not believe it either. For example, ornithologists Alan Feduccia and Larry renowned Martin thinks he is totally wrong from a script. A college textbook, developmental biology is as follows:

Not all biologists believe that birds are dinosaurs ... This group of scientists underscore the differences between dinosaurs and birds, arguing that the differences are too important to birds evolved from dinosaurs earlier. Alan Feduccia and Larry Martin, for example, argue that the birds could not have evolved from a known group of dinosaurs. They object to some of the most important data and cladistic support their claim of developmental biology and biomechanics. (2)

Feduccia has this to say about the theory of the evolution of reptiles, birds

Well, I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I see no similarities whatsoever. I do not see ... The theropod origins of birds, in my opine.